Subject: Re: [stella] Poker Solitaire From: <erik@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:53:00 -0500 |
>Look at this (practically impossible to get) hand: > >10h Jh Qh Kh Ah >10c Jc Qc Kc Ac >10s Js Qs Ks As >10d Jd Qd Kd Ad >2h 3h 4h 5h 6h > >If a royal flush and a straight flush are both 30 points, and 4 of a kind >is 16... that's (5*30)+(5*16) = 230 points. If a royal flush is 36 points, it's >254 points, which still fits in one byte... > >Can you think of a higher-scoring hand? Yes. If the last row is instead 5-6-7-8-9 of hearts, you get a straight on the upper-left to lower-right diagonal. >Do you think the royal flush should be worth more than a regular straight >flush? The standard scoring system counts them the same (30).. Nah. It's a matter of luck, and it doesn't make any difference in real poker either, other than just being an ace-high royal flush. On the other hand, it does add more strategic depth to the game. Why not use a difficulty switch to toggle? ---------------------------------------------------- Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Poker Solitaire, Manuel Polik | Thread | Re: [stella] Poker Solitaire, B. Watson |
Re: [stella] Poker Solitaire, B. Watson | Date | Re: [stella] Copy Protection, John Saeger |
Month |