Subject: Re: [stella] Closed Captioning Query From: Mark De Smet <de-smet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:23:33 -0500 (CDT) |
> Re-reading the info I have, I just realized that each cycle of the clock > run-in is, in fact, one bit width. So I was incorrect in saying that the I noticed this too, and I'm suspecting that the decoder uses this clock to determine the sampling rate of the rest of the data. If this is true, it doesn't neccesarily need to all be correct, just spaced evenly. Alternatively, as Glenn suggests if newer decoders don't really use the clock, perhaps we should just give it the couple clocks we can display, then give it the data in the normal timing. > data bits are modulated. (And my calculations in 2 are very wrong.) So > each bit is either the presence or absence of a cycle (with 0deg=0IRE and > 180deg=50IRE). Which means the playfield is eligible, depending on how > much the decoder requires a sine wave. The sine wave is only recommended for the clock run in, right? The spec only really calls for a symetrical waveform with peaks and lows equal to the 0 and 1 value. I don't think it would be a problem to give it square waves instead. Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Closed Captioning Quer, Eric Ball | Thread | Re: [stella] Closed Captioning Quer, Glenn Saunders |
[stella] player graphics on 2600 10, KirkIsrael | Date | [stella] goodtools?, Mark De Smet |
Month |