Thomas Jentzsch <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> What kind of PAL support are you going to implement?
I was planning on simple PAL-50. I doubt this is the sort of
game that people will actually *play* a lot, especially with the
original SI and Space Instigators also out there. :) I'm
not really worried about the slower game play. 16-bit math for
fractional speeds is no obstacle for me, but rewriting the
kernel is. I'm also out of RAM and would have to do a lot
of consolidation/optimization. Could certainly be done - I've
got a half-dozen different single-bit variables that are each
using a whole byte - but I'm trying to move on from this project
to something new. :)
Albert Yarusso <albert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thomas beat me to the bunch by suggesting "INV+".
I think I agree too. INV+ it is, thanks.
> Of course, that means we'd need to change the label. Might be
> time to create a nice manual or the game as well
I'll look to work with you on this after I get the game code
completed. I don't think a full-blown classic 2600 style manual
is really worth much for this game, but a simple instruction
sheet is probably a good idea.
"B. Watson" <atari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> INV is a good enough name, but make it stand for something... > I can't think of what. `Invaders from Neptune and Venus'
> maybe? (nah).
INV's Not Vnix. :D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
