Re: [stella] The future of Stella (i.e. debugger needed)

At 09:14 PM 5/17/2004, you wrote:

> If all these systems (several of them obscure and with few if any
> homebrewers) can have debuggers, certainly one of the modern 2600 emulators
> (Stella and Z26) can have one so we don't have to struggle so much anymore.

You could always try MESS.

I will, but I wonder if it supports illegal opcodes.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/

Current Thread
Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAME, (continued) Albert Yarusso - Mon, 17 May 2004 18:47:45 -0400 (EDT) Stephen Anthony - Mon, 17 May 2004 19:21:59 -0400 (EDT) Glenn Saunders - Mon, 17 May 2004 22:56:29 -0400 (EDT) B. Watson - Tue, 18 May 2004 00:15:20 -0400 (EDT) Glenn Saunders - Tue, 18 May 2004 05:06:34 -0400 (EDT) <= Stephen Anthony - Tue, 18 May 2004 08:18:09 -0400 (EDT) Christian Bogey - Tue, 18 May 2004 10:56:10 -0400 (EDT) cybergoth - Mon, 17 May 2004 12:58:27 -0400 (EDT)

Current Thread

Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAME, (continued)
- cybergoth - Mon, 17 May 2004 12:58:27 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [stella] The future of Stella (, B. Watson	Thread	Re: [stella] The future of Stella (, Stephen Anthony
Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAM, Thomas Jentzsch	Date	Re: [stella] The future of Stella (, Stephen Anthony
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home