Subject: Re: MS chat tidbits From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:12:53 +0100 (BST) |
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Jon Smirl wrote: > We better not see a patent on this, I've been using streamed SAX XSL > processing with XT for over a year now. This has been a feature of XT since > the day it was released. XSL has never had a requirement that the input or > output of the processor be actual trees only abstract ones. There is also > prior art on compiling an XSL sheet where a schema describes the input and > using the schema to improve the compilation. IIRC, XT simply uses the SAX stream to create it's own internal tree structure. It's not a streaming XSLT implementation. -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: MS chat tidbits, Jon Smirl | Thread | Re: MS chat tidbits, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Simple and powerful [Re: Managing s, Eric van der Vlist | Date | Re: MS chat tidbits, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Month |