Subject: RE: About the source library From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:04:17 +0000 (GMT) |
Didier PH Martin writes: > <Reply> > I agree with you. So let's compose a letter to James to ask him what are his > thoughts on this. > </Reply> I think James is probably reading all this, however silently :-} > The idea is to try to have three family of modules: > > a) Grove/DOM > b) Script engines > c) formatting object mappers (backbends) splendid. > This way, for example, a XSL or DSSSL processor could be running on a Grove > (the grove being created either by a XML or SGML document). And formatting > objects mappers called dependent of the type of format expected. I am let me get this straight; you would end up with an archtecture in which I could remove the DSSSL script processor, insert an XSL one, but still use a TeX backend? now there is indeed a worthy project. I want one. Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About the source library, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: About the source library, Didier PH Martin |
Re: About the source library, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: About the source library, Glauber Ribeiro |
Month |