Subject: Re: SGML entity mgmt stds From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 17 Jun 1999 13:56:45 -0400 |
"Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > so the following hierarchy is OK for me: > SGML > |__ DTD > |__ entity > |__ scripts > |__ misc. Why not use the good work of Cees, which would make integration on Debian and RedHat (?) quite a bit easier: sgml |__ dtd |__ entities # for standalone shared entities such as ISO Latin 1 |__ stylesheet |__ declaration |__ misc # for misc scripts and stuff As for catalog files, I leave that up to the local maintainer. Often it makes sense to have them as the file 'catalog' in the same dir as the DTDs. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: SGML entity mgmt stds, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: SGML entity mgmt stds, Didier PH Martin |
Re: SGML entity mgmt stds, Ralph Ferris | Date | Debian / Jade patches (was Re: [OJ], Adam Di Carlo |
Month |