Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:02:48 +0100 |
> Just a simple no? Please, as a guru on the matter, sustain in order to understand why not. ;-) It wasn't just a no. In my first drat of my reply "no" was the entire content of the message I did add some qualifying remarks in the end before posting. To be honest I was surprised at the tone of your posting which appeared to be mainly designed to insult those people who had been attenpting to help you get to grips with the language. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Claudio Russo | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Stuart Brown |
Re: [xsl] Generated code is not wor, Joe Fawcett | Date | [xsl] select in the <xsl:param /> t, Simon Kelly |
Month |