Subject: Re: SGML declarations for subdocuments From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 13 Oct 1999 11:04:34 -0400 |
Norman Gray <norman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Using SGMLDECL in the catalog doesn't work (all this is described on > the SP pages[1], as well as the Oasis Technical Resolution on > catalogs[2]). That means that _everything_ is read using that SGML > declaration, including things which shouldn't be. This seems to > confound Jade's DSSSL processing. SGMLDECL in a delegated catalog has > no effect. > > Using DTDDECL seemed a good idea, but SP seems not to support it. >From the Debian standpoint, I would like very much to be able to associate a declaration with a DTD (DTDDECL). Right now we avoid SGMLDECL and DTDDECL because they don't suit our purposes, leaving it to the user to set the DECL when SP's default isn't right for them. So consider this a "request for implementation of DTDDECL". -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Norman Gray | Thread | Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Matthias Clasen |
More Word-97 Woes with valid JADE o, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Matthias Clasen |
Month |