Subject: Re: SGML declarations for subdocuments From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 18:08:41 +0200 |
> > Using DTDDECL seemed a good idea, but SP seems not to support it. > > >From the Debian standpoint, I would like very much to be able to > associate a declaration with a DTD (DTDDECL). Right now we avoid > SGMLDECL and DTDDECL because they don't suit our purposes, leaving it > to the user to set the DECL when SP's default isn't right for them. > > So consider this a "request for implementation of DTDDECL". > Patches always welcome... -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Norman Walsh |
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Adam Di Carlo | Date | title for figure, Joerg Wittenberger |
Month |