Subject: Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a canonical way to group multiple appendices and a glossary under a single 'Appendix' heading? From: Debbie Lapeyre <dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:00:14 -0400 |
On Sep 3, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (Now I'm with Gerrit. It does seem a bit like the tail > wagging the dog. If any book-part can have back matter, then the back > matter inside any one of them is its own, not the back matter in some > larger undefined scope.) My own compromise might be to render the > appendix and glossary as generic 'sec' (with @sec-type) so they could > be in the body of the book-part. You may call it a <sec> inside either <body> or <back>. There is maddeningly complete freedom on this point. The outer 'Appendix' could be a <sec>, the <app> inside it could then be <sec>s too. Your choice, but I'd call an <app> and <app>. --Debbie ================================================================ Deborah A Lapeyre mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301-315-9631 (USA) Suite 207 Fax: 301-315-8385 Rockville, MD 20850 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: Consultancy for XML, XSLT, and Schematron ================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a ca, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a ca, Wendell Piez |
[jats-list] Training on JATS XML an, Donohoe, Paul | Date | Re: [jats-list] Training on JATS XM, Debbie Lapeyre |
Month |