Subject: RE: XSL in IE 5.0, or is it? From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 12:30:58 +1000 |
At 04:51 21/11/1998, Laurie Mann wrote: | >From: clilley [SMTP:chris@xxxxxx] | >So in answer to the original query - probably a bit of both, and yes | >lets hope that the final IE5 release is fully conformant, with any | >proprietary extensions clearly marked out as such by being in a | >different, non-xsl namespace. | | I'm not holding my breath after the mess Microsoft | has made of "standards" in the past. Look at Java (ActiveX) | and the silly ways Frontpage butchers HTML. Another step in Microsoft's process of "de-comoditizing" open standards ... J ------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Beyond the Idea" ACN 081 019 623 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL in IE 5.0, or is it?, Laurie Mann | Thread | RE: XSL in IE 5.0, or is it?, Gabriel Paiz III |
Re: ANN: TeXML enables transform fo, Terry Allen | Date | RE: XSL in IE 5.0, or is it?, Gabriel Paiz III |
Month |