Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy)

[Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"John E. Simpson" wrote:
> 
> I'm a little schizoid on the accessibility issue. The small-d democrat in
> me says there's no question as to its value; the lazy
> least-commmon-denominator webmaster says it's still too hard. 

That's exactly why I think that the energy should be spent up-front, in
the formatting object design stage.

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have
performed better had it been tuned."
"Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that the research
was sponsored by Microsoft."
  http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/1999/9904221410.asp


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list