Subject: RE: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy) From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:14:16 -0400 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > > > James Tauber wrote: > > > > What would be nice (and I think this is entirely possible with XSL as it > > stands) is for people to include ICADD SDAFORMs in their FOs. > > I agree that this should be possible, but ICADD is designed to be used as > an architecture: the document type designer is supposed to think these > things through in advance. In this case the document type designer is the > XSL WG. > James makes the type of constructive argument that this discussion group needs. Not being an expert by any means at all in ICADD, but seeing the important implications for accessability, the suggestion seems to be a very sensible and doable thing. The recent XSLT draft as well as the integration of XSL and XPointer demonstrates the fact that the WG is either taking the input from the group or is considering the same issues in parallel. My expectation that these very important accessability issues will be dealt with in the same fashion. Jonathan Borden http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transf, Paul Prescod | Thread | small image "Powered by XML", Duane Nickull |
Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transf, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Resolving ENTITY attributes, Rick Geimer |
Month |