Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy)

Subject: Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy)
From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 08:48:20 -0500
James Tauber wrote:
> 
> What would be nice (and I think this is entirely possible with XSL as it
> stands) is for people to include ICADD SDAFORMs in their FOs. 

I agree that this should be possible, but ICADD is designed to be used as
an architecture: the document type designer is supposed to think these
things through in advance. In this case the document type designer is the
XSL WG.

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have
performed better had it been tuned."
"Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that the research
was sponsored by Microsoft."
  http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/1999/9904221410.asp


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread