Subject: Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy) From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 08:48:20 -0500 |
James Tauber wrote: > > What would be nice (and I think this is entirely possible with XSL as it > stands) is for people to include ICADD SDAFORMs in their FOs. I agree that this should be possible, but ICADD is designed to be used as an architecture: the document type designer is supposed to think these things through in advance. In this case the document type designer is the XSL WG. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have performed better had it been tuned." "Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that the research was sponsored by Microsoft." http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/1999/9904221410.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transf, James Tauber | Thread | RE: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transf, Jonathan Borden |
Re: XML/XSL Icons., Jeff Langdon | Date | RE: Accessible FOs (was: Re: Transf, Jonathan Borden |
Month |