Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?

[Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> It would be interesting to learn about some industry data, such as the number of
> lines of code resulting from and/or person years spent on a single
> XSLT project.

You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The 
numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for 
1.0, which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to 
large-scale programming.

Michael Kay
Saxonica