Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:01:01 +0100 |
There is no way (again: I know of) forThis fact certainly defines a limitation of XQuery and XSLT in a way that the absence of particular function libraries does not. The languages are designed for processing XML, and the type system they use is therefore strongly based on XML.
defining really new data types in a way comparable to, say, Haskell.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, G. Ken Holman |
Month |