Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML? From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:03:00 -0400 |
On 30/10/2010 21:43, G. Ken Holman wrote:This fact certainly defines a limitation of XQuery and XSLT in a way that the absence of particular function libraries does not. The languages are designed for processing XML, and the type system they use is therefore strongly based on XML.There is no way (again: I know of) for defining really new data types in a way comparable to, say, Haskell.
-- Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Wolfgang Laun |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] document('') returning null i, J Ferry |
Month |