Subject: Re: [xsl] Where is 'intersect' Operator Defined in XPath 3? From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:33:13 -0000 |
> I'm not sure, though, Dimitre, what youbd like to achieve. I assume that no one will rewrite the existing stack of documents > to make them more compact. Would you rather wish that a more concise wording/writing will be used for future enhancements? This is a very good question, Christian! Certainly, making the spec more compact would be helpful. If this is not a realistic goal, then why not split the spec into several, smaller documents, for example: 1) Core, and 2) Streaming? (For example) If vendors today are offering both a free and a complete version of their XSLT 3.0 implementation, why not have the documentation being split according to this respective functionality? Thanks, Dimitre On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:57 PM Christian GrC<n christian.gruen@xxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If there is a single person that has read all 1100 pages of the XSLT 3.0 >> Spec, please, do let us know. If this number is more than 5 - 6, then that >> would be really amazing. >> > > I definitely haven't; but I haven't read other comprehensive specs either > (such as the one from Java), and that still didn't stop me using the > implemented results. A spec can be helpful to answer specific questions if > no higher-level documentation is available b and it's a pity that such > specs are often not publicly available. If it doesnbt serve as primary > source (and if I don't need to implement itb&), it shouldn't matter that > much if it appears to be bulky. > > I'm not sure, though, Dimitre, what youbd like to achieve. I assume that > no one will rewrite the existing stack of documents to make them more > compact. Would you rather wish that a more concise wording/writing will be > used for future enhancements? > > My personal impression is that the more recent X specs are verbose indeed, > but as a result they are more complete and concise than most other specs > Ibve been able to read. And Ibm regularly surprised of all the edge and > special cases that had been considered years before any user had a chance > to stumble upon them in practice. > > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/782854> (by > email <>) > -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :) ------------------------------------- Sanity is madness put to good use. ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Where is 'intersect' Oper, Christian Grün chris | Thread | Re: [xsl] Where is 'intersect' Oper, C. M. Sperberg-McQue |
Re: [xsl] Where is 'intersect' Oper, C. M. Sperberg-McQue | Date | Re: [xsl] Where is 'intersect' Oper, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |