Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please?

Subject: Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please?
From: "Trevor Nicholls trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:55:48 -0000
Thank you all for a very useful discussion.

Our technical author uses structured FrameMaker for the heavy lifting but for
quick and casual editing I have been using emacs and sublime text. I've had
the nxml emacs module enabled which is XML-aware but I had never heard of the
relax-NG option, so thank you Dave for that.

 It set me to hunting what might exist by way of similar packages for Sublime
Text, and I found one called Exalt. It doesn't force only valid input but it
does have a single keystroke validation function which highlights any
validation errors. I didnbt have to do anything smart by way of setup; if
the DTD or XSD referenced in the document header exists in the local
filesystem it just uses it.

cheers
T

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2022 03:45
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please?

On 17/08/2022 14:06, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen cmsmcq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
> At the moment I mostly use nxml mode, with key bindings modified to be
> closer to those of psgml mode.  (Are the psgml mode bindings better
> designed?  Or did I just get used to them first?  Possibly.)

I believe so, but as they can be rebound it's not very important.
I prefer psgml's way of presenting the attribute panel, but that's probably a
personal feeling.

The biggest stumbling block is that on current installations, psgml simply
won't execute: "xml-mode" has been grabbed by nxml, and my elisp skillz are
not adequate to resolve this.

Peter

Current Thread