Subject: Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please? From: "Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:24:26 -0000 |
An option: You say you are scanning / ocrbing? If you have an html output optionb& Use Saxon with the tidy option to strip out all attributes / css / script etc., then rebuild with the markup you want. I find that route preferable Hth On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:55, Trevor Nicholls trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you all for a very useful discussion. > > Our technical author uses structured FrameMaker for the heavy lifting but > for quick and casual editing I have been using emacs and sublime text. I've > had the nxml emacs module enabled which is XML-aware but I had never heard > of the relax-NG option, so thank you Dave for that. > > It set me to hunting what might exist by way of similar packages for > Sublime Text, and I found one called Exalt. It doesn't force only valid > input but it does have a single keystroke validation function which > highlights any validation errors. I didnbt have to do anything smart by way > of setup; if the DTD or XSD referenced in the document header exists in the > local filesystem it just uses it. > > cheers > T > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx < > xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2022 03:45 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please? > > On 17/08/2022 14:06, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen cmsmcq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > [...] > > At the moment I mostly use nxml mode, with key bindings modified to be > > closer to those of psgml mode. (Are the psgml mode bindings better > > designed? Or did I just get used to them first? Possibly.) > > I believe so, but as they can be rebound it's not very important. > I prefer psgml's way of presenting the attribute panel, but that's > probably a personal feeling. > > The biggest stumbling block is that on current installations, psgml simply > won't execute: "xml-mode" has been grabbed by nxml, and my elisp skillz are > not adequate to resolve this. > > Peter > > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Trevor Nicholls trev | Thread | Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Peter Flynn peter@xx |
Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Trevor Nicholls trev | Date | Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Kevin Brown kevin.br |
Month |