On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Piero Cavina wrote:
> frogger... much better than the previous screen, with some very interesting,
> playfield based, "water-simulation" effects. Hmmm, is there a 3rd screen?
Check out the surfing portion of California Games for a great example of
innovative dynamic playfield stuff.
> Whithout color striping the 2600 wouldn't have been the same.
> The Philips Videopac (oops, Magnavox Odissey for you in the US) comes from
The O^2's sprites were at a blockier resolution than the 2600.
I don't think anything about the O^2 was better than the 2600.
It makes me feel old that "O^2" now is shorthand for an SGI computer.
--
Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
