Subject: Re: [stella] re: optimizations; Call for suggestions From: Greg Miller <gmiller@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 06:45:32 -0500 |
Nick S Bensema wrote: > > > > >> >The program would use straight or triple DES, so it couldn't be exported > >> >or posted to STELLA (but that's part of the point, actually, since > >> >encryption restrictions look silly when a 2600 cart can be banned.) > >> > > > >Good Lord! I'd hate to sit around waiting on THAT during debugging. *shudder* > > On the one hand, I guess the C64 or Atari 8-bit or some other 6502-based > machine could be used to design and test the encryption routines itself. > > But as far as speed goes, the Atari 8-bit is only twice as fast, and the > Commodore 64 is actually SLOWER in clock speed. DES is, shall we say, demanding... A small block of text can take an hour on a PC XT, until you finish the optimization. I'm afraid to think what it'd be like on a 6502... BTW: The C128 runs at 2MHz -- Video games and CCGS: http://www.angelfire.com/tn/squirrels TW (online game): http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Bay/1367 Magic cards: http://www.angelfire.com/tn/squirrels/magic.html ***** ATTENTION NEWBIES: Limit signatures to four lines! ***** -- Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] re: optimizations; Cal, Nick S Bensema | Thread | Re: [stella] re: optimizations; Cal, Robin Harbron |
Re: [stella] re: optimizations; Cal, Nick S Bensema | Date | Re: [stella] re: optimizations; Cal, Robin Harbron |
Month |