RE: [stella] why -68?

Subject: RE: [stella] why -68?
From: Nicolás Olhaberry <nolh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 1980 15:04:53 -0300
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicolás Olhaberry <nolh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: [stella] why -68?

> colorclock 66 instead of the documented 68. If this is correct. when I
> position an object (having it´s delay in consideration)  to be displayed
> colorclock 66, or , let say, 159 (since I´m not too sure about moving

Ooops, where it says 159 it should be 227, I meant positioning an object in
rightmost part of the screen, so a part of it will be displayed in the left.



Archives (includes files) at
Unsub & more at

Current Thread