|
Subject: RE: [stella] why -68? From: Nicolás Olhaberry <nolh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 1980 15:04:53 -0300 |
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicolás Olhaberry <nolh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: [stella] why -68?
> colorclock 66 instead of the documented 68. If this is correct. when I
> position an object (having it´s delay in consideration) to be displayed
in
> colorclock 66, or , let say, 159 (since I´m not too sure about moving
Ooops, where it says 159 it should be 227, I meant positioning an object in
the
rightmost part of the screen, so a part of it will be displayed in the left.
Bye,
Nicolás.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [stella] why -68?, Eckhard Stolberg | Thread | Re: [stella] the new artillery game, Manuel Polik |
| Re: [stella] why -68?, Eckhard Stolberg | Date | [stella] Gunfight Release Candidate, Manuel Polik |
| Month |