Chris wrote
>Hrm, you're right! I was sure the proto's square's were
>smaller, the size of LDA #$Absolute/STA COLUPF. Which is what
>had me thinking they'd done a RAM routine.
This would result in 5*3 = 15 pixel wide squares.
>But they're not, they're the size of LDA #$ZeroPage/STA
>COLUPF. Strange!
This would result in 6*3 = 18 pixel wide squares. But they are
16 pixels wide.
>But check the attached, it uses quad sized P0 and P1 at the
>left and right of the cube to create the black diagonals
>(black so they're obvious, and so I don't have to keep
>fiddling with the code). This leaves only the middle two
>squares, which could be handled by stationary M0 and M1 and
>just changing their lengths.
Yes, that should work, though you'll also have "blocky"
diagonals, will still be limited to n*3 wide cubes and you will
have HMOVE blanks (which the original has not).
>Your kung-fu is no good! You cannot hurt me! The toad has iron
>skin.
Ouch! :-D
>That being said, we've come up with several ways to do this
and it's not really a particularly interesting project
otherwise, so I think I'll go back to working on my curling
sim....
Hey, Curling for the 2600! What a thriller!!! :-)
Have fun!
Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
