Subject: Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question on namespaces From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:31:33 +0100 |
> #t = subset?(SGML XML) > and > #t = subset(XML XMLnamespace) > > but > > #f = subset(SGML XMLnamespace) > your second premise is wrong (backwards in fact). If the subset? relation is defined by X is a subset of Y if every X-application is a Y-application then XML is a subset of XML as given a suitable SGML declaration, every SGML parser is an XML parser but XML namespaces is an extra layer of processing, so it is not true that every XML application is an XMLnamespace application. Rather it is the other way round. Every XMLnamepace application is an XML one. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question o, Norman Walsh | Thread | (dsssl) Re: [OpenJade-devel] Re: Op, Paul Tyson |
Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | (dsssl) Practical Bibliography ques, Trent Shipley |
Month |