Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI: (was Hypothetical question on namespaces)

Subject: Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI: (was Hypothetical question on namespaces)
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:14:08 +0100
Trent Shipley writes:

 > -- It has very flexible facilities for defining the morphology of its own 
 > concrete lexis (called the concrete syntax in the standard).
 > ---- (One suspects that the flexibility in the concrete grammar was partly to 
 > ease assimilation of existing mark-up languages to SGML)
and did anyone ever use it like that? a colleague of mine once tried
to make SGML parse LaTeX, but gave up :-}

 > Would it make sense to compartmentalize what we have now in the next major 
 > round of revisions along these sorts of lines.

um, revisions of what? dsssl? sgml? xml? the world?

I dont deny the interest of your list, but is this list the right
place to publish it?

sebastian


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist

Current Thread