Subject: Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI: (was Hypothetical question on namespaces) From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:14:08 +0100 |
Trent Shipley writes: > -- It has very flexible facilities for defining the morphology of its own > concrete lexis (called the concrete syntax in the standard). > ---- (One suspects that the flexibility in the concrete grammar was partly to > ease assimilation of existing mark-up languages to SGML) and did anyone ever use it like that? a colleague of mine once tried to make SGML parse LaTeX, but gave up :-} > Would it make sense to compartmentalize what we have now in the next major > round of revisions along these sorts of lines. um, revisions of what? dsssl? sgml? xml? the world? I dont deny the interest of your list, but is this list the right place to publish it? sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Trent Shipley | Thread | Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, M. Wroth |
Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Trent Shipley | Date | Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question o, David Carlisle |
Month |