Subject: Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question on namespaces From: Trent Shipley <tcshipley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:11:41 -0700 |
Yes, it would be common sense to just use XML and get namespace awareness automatically. Of course, the point is not to be practical, but to pose the problem: #t = subset?(SGML XML) and #t = subset(XML XMLnamespace) but #f = subset(SGML XMLnamespace) On Thursday 04 October 2001 01:17, you wrote: > Trent Shipley writes: > > Short of editing TEIL and the relevant modules in DocBook (or switching > > to the XML versions of both, that would be cheating since it should just > > work) > > Er, this sounds like common-sense, not cheating. Both Docbook and TEI > would say immediately that XML is the way of the future... > > Sebastian > > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
(dsssl) Re: XML not appropriate for, Karl Eichwalder | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question o, Norman Walsh |
(dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI, Trent Shipley | Date | Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |