|
Subject: Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question on namespaces From: Trent Shipley <tcshipley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:11:41 -0700 |
Yes, it would be common sense to just use XML and get namespace awareness
automatically.
Of course, the point is not to be practical, but to pose the problem:
#t = subset?(SGML XML)
and
#t = subset(XML XMLnamespace)
but
#f = subset(SGML XMLnamespace)
On Thursday 04 October 2001 01:17, you wrote:
> Trent Shipley writes:
> > Short of editing TEIL and the relevant modules in DocBook (or switching
> > to the XML versions of both, that would be cheating since it should just
> > work)
>
> Er, this sounds like common-sense, not cheating. Both Docbook and TEI
> would say immediately that XML is the way of the future...
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| (dsssl) Re: XML not appropriate for, Karl Eichwalder | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question o, Norman Walsh |
| (dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI, Trent Shipley | Date | Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Sebastian Rahtz |
| Month |