Subject: Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI: (was Hypothetical question on namespaces) From: "M. Wroth" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 06:17:05 -0700 |
Trent Shipley writes:
> -- It has very flexible facilities for defining the morphology of its own
> concrete lexis (called the concrete syntax in the standard).
> ---- (One suspects that the flexibility in the concrete grammar was partly to
> ease assimilation of existing mark-up languages to SGML)
and did anyone ever use it like that? a colleague of mine once tried
to make SGML parse LaTeX, but gave up :-}
Mark B. Wroth <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | (dsssl) Re: XML not appropriate for, Karl Eichwalder |
Re: (dsssl) Practical Bibliography , M. Wroth | Date | Re: (dsssl) Practical Bibliography , Trent Shipley |
Month |