<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type

Subject: Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type
From: "Julie Blair julie.blair@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:20:17 -0000
I agree with Mike on removing barxivb from the restricted list and
replacing with bpreprintb. Why have one preprint archive specified, but
not others?

----
Julie Blair
XML Architect
SAGE Publishing
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
USA

T: 805.410.7326
www.sagepublishing.com<http://www.sagepublishing.com>

Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC | Melbourne

From: Mike Eden meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 6:14 AM
To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type

I was thinking it would have been better to have <article-id
pub-id-type=bpreprintb assigning-authority=bbiorxivb>  and <article-id
pub-id-type=bpreprintb assigning-authority=barxivb>  etc. but I can
see that bpublisherb fits in this scenario, though lest descriptive I
feel.

My other concern is that barxivb is already a value in the @pub-id-type
list so could be added as just that, but given the above example and Markbs
it would also qualify as an assigning-authority, but bbiorxivb could not
sit in both camps.  If the list is not going to be added to, would it not make
sense to remove some of these values to encourage a more consistent mark up?


Regards
Mike

EasyUnsubscribe<http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/243121> (by
email<>)
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type, Mike Eden meden@xxxx Thread Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type, Debbie Lapeyre dalap
Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type, Mark Donoghue m.dono Date Re: [jats-list] pub-id-type, Pieter Lamers pieter
Month