Subject: Re: [jats-list] Why is archiving JATS with a DOI not common? From: "Nikos Markantonatos nikos@xxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:51:15 -0000 |
Hello Castedo. There are literally tens of millions of scholarly articles encoded under JATS Archiving DTD which also possess a DOI. I know that Atypon is hosting a good portion of them and they all possess a DOI. So, yes, JATS XML DOIs are extremely common as you would expect. Does this address your question? Nikos On 4/15/22 7:10 PM, Castedo Ellerman castedo@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: I'm new to JATS and a bit confused why archiving JATS with a DOI is not common. I have yet to see an example actually. The closest example I have seen is eLife publicly storing JATS XML files in github.com/elifesciences/elife-article-xml Are there any examples of JATS being archived with a DOI? I believe many in this forum would agree that a DOI should refer NOT to a manifestation of an article (in FRBR Group 1 terms) but rather the work or expression. https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/rationale.html reads: B "The intent of the Archiving Tag Set is to provide a standardized format in which to preserve the intellectual content ..." So shouldn't it be common that DOIs reference the intellectual content in the form of JATS XML? As it stand now, it seems most DOIs to scientific articles are actually IDs to manifestations at journal websites which are optimized for the business interests of the publisher. Thank you in advance if someone can help me understand why JATS XML DOIs are not common. -Castedo -- [IMAGE] Nikos Markantonatos | Atypon, Greece Operations Head Leoforos Ethnikis Antistaseos 39A, 3rd floor, Nea Ionia, 14234, Greece office +302110133003 | mobile +306974302945 | nikos@xxxxxxxxxx [IMAGE] atyponb.com CONFIDENTIAL: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and legally privileged information for the exclusive use of the designated recipients. Unauthorized review, use, storage, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message. JATS-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[jats-list] Why is archiving JATS w, Castedo Ellerman cas | Thread | Re: [jats-list] Why is archiving JA, Castedo Ellerman cas |
[jats-list] JATS-Con Preliminary Pr, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | Date | Re: [jats-list] Why is archiving JA, David Haber dhaber@x |
Month |