Re: [jats-list] Why is archiving JATS with a DOI not common?

["Diane Collins dcollins@xxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The doi is: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0387
It gets registered thru https://www.crossref.org/

I work for rsna.org and we use atypon w/ jats xml.

Let me know if I helped or if you need more information.
--Diane


-----Original Message-----
From: Castedo Ellerman castedo@xxxxxxxxxxx
<jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 2:54 PM
To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [jats-list] Why is archiving JATS with a DOI not common?

On 4/29/22 03:51, Nikos Markantonatos wrote:
> There are literally tens of millions of scholarly articles encoded
> under JATS Archiving DTD which also possess a DOI. I know that Atypon
> is hosting a good portion of them and they all possess a DOI. So, yes,
> JATS XML DOIs are extremely common as you would expect.
>
> Does this address your question?

Thank you Nikos! I did not know Atypon is hosting so many JATS encoded
articles. Very impressive! I have zero experience in the commercial publishing
industry so these insights are very helpful, thank you.

In hindsight, my question was a bit ambiguous. Here's a less ambiguous
question:

Is there any DOI registrant that resolves a DOI to the JATS XML of the article
with PubMed ID 29618526?
(https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpubmed.ncb
i.nlm.nih.gov%2F29618526%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cdcollins%40rsna.org%7C43f42752
ec7f4be2e24d08da2a1a0ce1%7Cfb5fefcd7ca642f3b443917c2a68cecd%7C1%7C0%7C6378685
88782900348%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBT
iI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=uqVtIYAmLn2saFmYjNjIdryf7
rW5xccjVtZT3k%2BIfeg%3D&amp;reserved=0)

This is an article published by the Royal Society which is a customer of
Atypon. As a DOI registrant, the Royal Society resolves their
doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 to their website from which a PDF can be downloaded
(and the article is also encoded in HTML).  But as best I can tell, the Royal
Society makes zero effort to have that DOI, or any other DOI that it manages,
resolve to a JATS XML file or package.

Am I mistaken? If I am mistaken, what is the DOI? Is there any example of any
DOI registrant that manages article DOIs to resolve, for the long-term, to a
long-term archived JATS XML file or package?

My questions are not about whether somebody at some point in time encoded the
article into JATS or somebody else might be storing JATS on some server. It's
about the relationship between JATS and the responsibility and good faith
effort by a DOI registrant for a long-term DOI to resolve to the digital
object they archive long-term.

Thank you,
   Castedo Ellerman


Radiological Society of North America
820 Jorie Blvd, Oak Brook, IL 60523
TEL 1-630-571-2670
FAX 1-630-571-7837

RSNA 2022 Annual Meeting<https://RSNA.org/annual-meeting>
November 27 b December 1, 2022