On 4/29/22 03:51, Nikos Markantonatos wrote:
There are literally tens of millions of scholarly articles encoded
under JATS Archiving DTD which also possess a DOI. I know that Atypon
is hosting a good portion of them and they all possess a DOI. So, yes,
JATS XML DOIs are extremely common as you would expect.
Does this address your question?
Thank you Nikos! I did not know Atypon is hosting so many JATS encoded
articles. Very impressive! I have zero experience in the commercial
publishing industry so these insights are very helpful, thank you.
In hindsight, my question was a bit ambiguous. Here's a less ambiguous
question:
Is there any DOI registrant that resolves a DOI to the JATS XML of the
article with PubMed ID 29618526? (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29618526/)
This is an article published by the Royal Society which is a customer of
Atypon. As a DOI registrant, the Royal Society resolves their
doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 to their website from which a PDF can be
downloaded (and the article is also encoded in HTML).B But as best I can
tell, the Royal Society makes zero effort to have that DOI, or any other
DOI that it manages, resolve to a JATS XML file or package.
Am I mistaken? If I am mistaken, what is the DOI? Is there any example
of any DOI registrant that manages article DOIs to resolve, for the
long-term, to a long-term archived JATS XML file or package?
My questions are not about whether somebody at some point in time
encoded the article into JATS or somebody else might be storing JATS on
some server. It's about the relationship between JATS and the
responsibility and good faith effort by a DOI registrant for a long-term
DOI to resolve to the digital object they archive long-term.
Thank you,
B Castedo Ellerman