Subject: RE: a question on scanning From: "Humphrey, Brenadine Ms" <humphreyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:56:15 +0100 |
I think the question with Sec. 121 is the "for an authorized entity" stipulation. Although I agree, it seems likely that the original material is no longer protected. ' 121. Limitations on exclusive rights: reproduction for blind or other people with disabilities (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement of copyright for an authorized entity to reproduce or to distribute copies or phonorecords of a previously published, nondramatic literary work if such copies or phonorecords are reproduced or distributed in specialized formats exclusively for use by blind or other persons with disabilities. And while this doesn't answer the question, it is relevant: the US Copyright Office has a Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comments at: http://www.copyright.gov/docs/sccr/ on a "treaty proposal introduced by the delegations of Brazil, Ecuador, and Paraguay, which would mandate certain exceptions and other practices regarding the cross-border import, export and qualified distribution of copyrighted works for the blind, visually impaired, and other reading disabled persons, without permission of the rights holders." Comments are being accepted through 13 NOV 09. -Brenadine Brenadine Carol Humphrey Copyright Specialist George C. Marshall Center College of International Security Studies DSN 314.440.2699 COM +49 (0)8821 750.2699 humphreyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Peter Hirtle [mailto:pbh6@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 3:33 PM To: Hudock, Sandy L; digital-copyright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: a question on scanning At 08:41 AM 11/6/2009 -0700, Hudock, Sandy L wrote: >One of my colleagues is trying to find out the copyright status on this >title in order to be able to scan it for use by a visually disabled >student at our >university: > >Title: The story of Teapot Dome. Sandy: In Copyright & Cultural Institutions (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1495365), I present a workflow that can be followed when thinking about digitization. In this case, I would start by asking if the 1924 original is in the public domain (and is the reason why Burt Franklin reprinted it). I find no evidence that the 1924 book was renewed for copyright, so I believe we can assume that it is public domain. The title has already been digitized by California and is in the Hathi Trust collection (albeit closed), but I would contact them using the procedures on their help page to see if they could immediately release this as an open work. If you really want to digitize the reprint, you next have to ask whether Burt Franklin added any new copyrighted content when it published the reprint. The book does not show up in the Stanford or Copyright Office databases (though the latter is from 1978), which suggests to me that the work was never registered for copyright. This greatly reduces any potential harm that could accrue by digitizing it. I would look and see, however, if it was published with a copyright notice. If it was, then I would check and see if there was any new content since that is the only stuff that could be protected. Lastly, don't forget Section 121 of the Copyright Act. Under this section, it is not an infringement to reproduce "published, nondramatic literary work if such copies... are reproduced or distributed in specialized formats exclusively for use by blind or other persons with disabilities." "Specialized formats" includes "braille, audio, or digital text which is exclusively for use by blind or other persons with disabilities." This would suggest to me that you could make a digital copy of the work for the use of the student so long as it is for that student's exclusive use. Peter B. Hirtle US History and General History Bibliographer Senior Policy Advisory Cornell University Library 221 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 peter.hirtle@xxxxxxxxxxx t. 607.255-4033 f. 607/255-2493 Purchase request: http://www.library.cornell.edu/services/purchase.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: a question on scanning, Peter Hirtle | Thread | RE: a question on scanning, Peter Hirtle |
Re: a question on scanning, Peter Hirtle | Date | RE: a question on scanning, Peter Hirtle |
Month |