Re: (dsssl) twoside

[Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

MARK.WROTH@xxxxxxxxxxx (Wroth, Mark) writes:

> Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> commented (in response to Peter Nilsson)
> 
> >"Nilsson, Peter" <pni@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> > JadeTeX, I remind myself, forces a page sequence to occupy an even
> >> > number of pages if twosidedness is turned on. Can anyone defend this?
> >> 
> >> I've never seen something in the spec forcing this (just checked). It
> >> doesn't talk about single- or double-sided pages in the section about
> s-p-s.
> 
> >I guess it sounds like a bug.
> 
> Does it really? I would not expect a simple page sequence to necessarily
> have an even or odd number of pages in general. But if the document is
> specified to be two-sided (which, BTW, I did not realize was _possible_ with
> a simple-page-sequence), I would expect it to have an even number of pages.

Sure, but that shouldn't be forced on -- there should be a way to set
it one-sided, right? 

Maybe I misinterpreted Sebastian's question..

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist