Subject: Re: [jats-list] JATS - Gripes and Suggestions From: "G. Ken Holman g.ken.holman@xxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:39:33 -0000 |
Along with this idea, how about revisiting Orange? Debbie had a good explanation as to why today's Orange doesn't work or at any rate has few users (sorry I wish I could paraphrase). But the idea of Orange is a sound one. Or something between Orange and Blue. (Ochre?)
Another reason? Convincing technologists that JATS or a JATS-based standard will actually simplify things is difficult when a document model has hundreds of elements, a majority of which they can't see ever using, but must account for somehow.
-- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/j/ | Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources | Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) | Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman |
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] JATS - Gripes and S, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Thread | Re: [jats-list] JATS - Gripes and S, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
Re: [jats-list] JATS - Gripes and S, Tommie Usdin btusdin | Date | Re: [jats-list] JATS - Gripes and S, Latterner, Martin (N |
Month |