Re: (dsssl) [help wanted] OpenJade

["Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Adam Di Carlo writes:
 > Well, that's good to hear, but it seems to me that the XSL processors
 > themselves break with every version number which is not prime.

FOP changes rapidly. but XEP works, Antenna House works, PassiveTeX
works (on a good day)

 > > what I do not know (from lack of trying) is whether the PDF and MIF
 > > backends to Jade do as good a job.
 > 
 > What PDF backend?    You mean the RTF backend?

no, the direct PDF backend.

 > > To my mind, the OpenJade project should really be pushing the direct
 > > PDF backend.
 > 
 > Yes, that would be nice.  But we're not in much of a position to push
 > anything right now.

indeed. so the jade/dsssl community needs to set some priorities for itself....

sebastian


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist